top of page

How to Raise Funding for Rail Projects in the Trump Administration

Writer's picture: Tate LindenTate Linden

Our friends over at the Japan International Transport and Tourism Institute, USA just released an insightful report titled "The Direction of Transportation and Tourism Policies under the Incoming Trump Administration (Trump 2.0)" By Kazuya Fukuhara.


If I read it correctly, JITTI suggests that rail communities - and the nation writ large - should prepare for some major shifts in infrastructure policy. Here’s a summary of what’s on the horizon for American rail according to their team:


Infrastructure Spending Cuts: The new administration plans to focus on budget reductions instead of expanding infrastructure investments. While most rail-related funds from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) have already been committed, the next reauthorization in 2026 could reduce overall funding while refocusing on core infrastructure like roads, rail, and bridges. 

High-Speed Rail Projects Under Scrutiny: They state that the California High-Speed Rail Authority's project has been flagged for defunding, while the Brightline West Trains route, connecting Las Vegas to Southern California, may gain support due to its political significance and timeline tied to the 2026 Los Angeles Olympics.

Freight and Passenger Rail Considerations: Expect a reduced emphasis on public transit and sustainability projects, with a pivot toward traditional infrastructure priorities. This shift could mean fewer resources for modernization and decarbonization efforts.

EV Policy Changes: The administration is likely to scale back funding for EV infrastructure and tax credits. While this primarily impacts road transportation, it could also slow rail decarbonization partnerships and renewable energy investments near rail corridors.

Other Considerations: DEI is a target in some transit sectors, with the administration likely framing its removal as an effort to improve safety and efficiency.

Labor shortages are possible in regions or sectors that rely on seasonal or temporary foreign labor. This could drive up labor costs and/or increase the drive to embrace automation - particularly in the tourism sector.


My Thoughts?


Assuming the data provided is sound, rail communities seeking funding for safety, accessibility, and modernization must be far more focused and proactive:


Drill in on “hard infrastructure” priorities rather than environmental.


Build coalitions that emphasize local economic impact and job creation. (Railtowns is here to help with coalition-building.)


Stay informed - policy shifts can create both challenges and new funding windows. Join our mailing list to receive legal and legislative updates as they're available!

bottom of page